Crossfire Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: firebrand gone wrong? answer: feature not bug
- To:
- Subject: Re: firebrand gone wrong? answer: feature not bug
- From: Peter Mardahl <>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 14:54:03 -0700
- cc: crossfire (at) ifi.uio.no
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:11:37 BST." <>
In message <>, write
s:
>demons and all I kept getting was "you missed the demon" - I
>couldn't hit them at all. I did better if I wielded nothing
Since a Firebrand uses Fire as its attack instead of
Physical (it attacks only with AT_FIRE) you will ALWAYS
miss something which is immune to fire. It is a feature,
not a bug.
Other weapons will have this same effect somewhat differently,
as in a weapon with a pure AT_MAGIC attack hitting something
immune to magic, etc.
>Anyone have any idea what is going on? Surely Firebrand has
>a physical attack as well as a fire attack? This is all
Read the archetype for Firebrand. The behavior you describe
is exactly that of having only an AT_FIRE.
PeterM